Wednesday, October 27, 2021
68.3 F
Fort Worth

CFPB chief Cordray’s recess appointment actions survive suit by Texas bank

🕐 2 min read

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and director Richard Cordray defeated a legal challenge to actions taken by the agency while he was a 2012 recess appointee of President Barack Obama, with a judge delaying her decision on more resonant questions about the CFPB’s powers under the U.S. Constitution.

U.S. District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle in Washington said she would hold off on that decision until a separate suit raising the same constitutional issue is resolved by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. A three-judge appellate panel heard arguments in April in that case brought by New Jersey mortgage services company PHH Corp.

The CFPB was born out of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation. Cordray, its first director, was appointed while the the Senate was in recess.

State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, which first filed suit in 2012, challenged five lending-related regulations taken by Cordray during that interim period. The director formally ratified those acts after his confirmation by the Senate in 2013.

“Plaintiffs raise three arguments to dispute the effectiveness of Director Cordray’s ratification,” Huvelle wrote in her ruling Tuesday, “none of which is persuasive.

Bank attorney Greg Jacob, a partner in the Washington office of O’Melveny & Myers, said the decision will be appealed.

“Judge Huvelle’s holding that Director Cordray could ratify literally thousands of invalid actions, including invalid rulemakings, by publishing three perfunctory sentences with no accompanying process at all cannot be right, and we are confident we will prevail on appeal,” Jacob said by e-mail.

Moira Vahey, a CFPB spokeswoman, declined to comment on the court’s decision.

The Big Spring bank contends the agency’s director operates as a “mini-president of consumer finance” without being accountable to the president or Congress. PHH makes a similar argument, saying the CFPB director’s role violates the Constitution’s separation of powers principle.

Related Articles

970x250_DM_Leasing

Our Digital Sponsors

Latest Articles

Texas-Rangers-Welcome
Fort Worth Business Press Logo
This advertisement will close in
00
Months
00
Days
00
Hours
00
Minutes
00
Seconds
seconds..
Click here to continue to Fort Worth Business Press
Texas Rangers
Fort Worth Business Press Logo
This advertisement will close in
00
Months
00
Days
00
Hours
00
Minutes
00
Seconds
seconds..
Click here to continue to Fort Worth Business Press

Not ready to subscribe?

Try a few articles on us.

Enter your email address and we will give you access to three articles a month, to give us a try. You also get an opportunity to receive our newsletter with stories of the day.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Get our email updates

Stay up-to-date with the issues, companies and people that matter most to business in the Fort Worth.

  • Restaurants
  • Technology
  • and more!

FWBP Morning Brief

FWBP 5@5

Weekend Newsletter

  • Banking & Finance
  • Culture
  • Real Estate