Tuesday, January 18, 2022
56.2 F
Fort Worth
970x250_DM_Leasing

Oil analysts practice cautious capitulation as crude goes over $65

🕐 4 min read

LONDON — As oil prices climbed above $68 Tuesday for the first time since December, analysts at some of the world’s biggest banks were holding onto views that this would be a bad year for crude — just not as terrible as they originally predicted.

Rather then extending last year’s losses, Brent, the global benchmark, has rallied about 50 percent from a six-year low in January as demand accelerated and the rapid growth in supplies started to slow.

The rebound is a shock. At the start of 2015, Bank of America, Barclays and Goldman Sachs Group all predicted that oil might collapse to about $30 a barrel. Now, though, they are raising their price estimates while remaining skeptical that crude will gain much above current levels. There are still risks, including U.S. shale oil coming back into the market with the increase in prices, they say.

“We’re past the lows for the oil market,” Sabine Schels, an analyst at Bank of America in London, said by phone. “The balances are tightening. This is most visible in the U.S., where the surplus has eased significantly. Supply is still greater than demand, but less than it used to be.”

Bank of America raised its 2015 Brent crude forecast to $58 in a report on April 24, from $52 previously. The bank said in a report dated Jan. 15 that Brent would “spiral down” to $31, and West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S marker, to $32, by the end of the first quarter. Brent rose as high as $115.71 last June.

Barclays raised its 2015 forecast for average Brent prices to $60 in a report on April 28, up from $51 in February and $44 in January, citing surprisingly strong Chinese demand growth of 700,000 barrels a day in the first quarter. Concern that the conflict in Yemen will curb Middle East supplies, and output disruptions from Norway to Mexico added to the revision.

“The range seems to have shifted with the price discovery process,” Miswin Mahesh, an analyst at Barclays in London, said by phone. “It seems like a comfortable level now. What’s changed is how quickly demand has adjusted higher. The first- quarter China numbers are a great example.”

U.S. drillers cut the number of oil rigs in operation by 55 percent since the start of the year, according to Houston-based field-services company Baker Hughes Inc. Rigs targeting U.S. oil slid by 24 to 679, the lowest level since September 2010, Baker Hughes said on May 1. The nation’s output from tight-rock formations will decline in May, according to the Energy Information Administration.

“U.S. producers have responded more aggressively than we had expected,” Goldman Sachs analysts including New York-based Damien Courvalin said in an April 6 report. This gives “modest upside” to their three-month price target for WTI of $40, according to the report. The bank wasn’t able to make analysts available to interview for this article.

JPMorgan Chase & Co., which predicted that Brent could fall to $38 in March, raised its forecasts for the year to $62 on April 30.

“It’s a tighter market than we were expecting and I think demand is the culprit,” David Martin, JPMorgan’s London-based head of global oil strategy, said by phone on May 1. “Our view back in January was the build in stocks was really going to weigh on the crude market and depress the front end of the crude curve. We’ve seen upside surprises in demand, which have allowed refiners to run harder and absorb that crude.”

Refiners globally processed an extra 1 million barrels a day last quarter compared with a year earlier. The bear market in Brent crude ended without the most pessimistic estimates being realized. Futures have risen from a six-year low of $45.19 on Jan. 13 and were at $68.95 on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange at 9:39 a.m. local time.

Citigroup’s Ed Morse predicted in a report dated Feb. 9 that prices would “bottom” by the start of the second quarter, with WTI falling toward $20. Goldman Sachs said in a report dated Jan. 11 that Brent would trade at about $42 in early April. Goldman president Gary Cohn told CNBC on Jan. 26 that prices could fall to $30.

Still, analysts maintain the view prices will struggle to advance significantly in the second half.

U.S. shale supplies will prove more resilient than anticipated, as drilling resumes with rebounding prices, and demand in emerging economies will struggle to climb further as fuel subsidies are removed, Bank of America and Barclays predict. WTI may suffer a “double-dip” to $50 in the third quarter, Bank of America says.

“Growth in emerging markets is still fairly uncertain — higher oil prices would risk the recovery we’re seeing there,” said Barclays’s Mahesh, who forecasts Brent will average $61 and $66 in the third and fourth quarters respectively. “I wouldn’t say the worst is completely in the rear-view mirror.”

— With assistance from Bill Lehane in London.

Related Articles

Our Digital Sponsors

Latest Articles

Get our email updates

Stay up-to-date with the issues, companies and people that matter most to business in the Fort Worth.

  • Restaurants
  • Technology
  • and more!

FWBP Morning Brief

FWBP 5@5

Weekend Newsletter

  • Banking & Finance
  • Culture
  • Real Estate

Not ready to subscribe?

Try a few articles on us.

Enter your email address and we will give you access to three articles a month, to give us a try. You also get an opportunity to receive our newsletter with stories of the day.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.