70.2 F
Fort Worth
Tuesday, September 22, 2020
- Advertisements -
Government Farmers Branch renting ordinance blocked

Farmers Branch renting ordinance blocked

Other News

Fort Worth police make arrest in Walker cold case from 1974

One of Fort Worth’s most mysterious murders from the last 50 years has apparently been solved. On Tuesday, Sept....

Texas A&M Law professor recalls Ginsburg’s impact

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a towering women’s rights champion who became the court’s second female justice, died Friday at her home...

Supreme Court justices remember Ginsburg

'I loved her to pieces,' retired Justice Souter says of RBGWASHINGTON (AP) — The remaining eight Supreme Court justices, and two former...

Ginsburg death could have impact on several cases, including Affordable Care laws

By Abby Livingston and Juan Pablo Garnham, The Texas Tribune Sept. 18, 2020 "Ruth...
Robert Francis
Robert Francis
Robert is a Fort Worth native and longtime editor of the Fort Worth Business Press. He is a former president of the local Society of Professional Journalists and was a freelancer for a variety of newspapers, weeklies and magazines, including American Way, BrandWeek and InformatonWeek. A graduate of TCU, Robert has held a variety of writing and editing positions at publications such as the Grand Prairie Daily News and InfoWorld. He is also a musician and playwright.

 

NOMAAN MERCHANT, Associated Press

DALLAS (AP) — Farmers Branch’s law banning immigrants who are in the United States without legal permission from renting once again has been blocked by a court.

In the latest ruling on a series of laws targeting immigration that local governments across the nation have passed, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans said multiple parts of the ordinance in the Dallas suburb are unconstitutional and encroaches on the federal government’s authority.

“We conclude that enforcement of the ordinance conflicts with federal law,” the court said Monday. The appeals court relied heavily on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year that struck down parts of Arizona’s immigration law.

The suburb’s ordinance would have required all renters to obtain licenses. The city’s building inspector would check an immigrant’s status and deny licenses to anyone in the country without permission. Landlords who allowed immigrants without permits would have faced fines or revocations of their renters’ licenses.

Unless the U.S. Supreme Court decides to step in, Farmers Branch won’t be allowed to enforce the ordinance, which has sparked an expensive legal battle. As of late last year, the city — with about 29,000 residents just a few miles north of Dallas — had spent nearly $6 million on legal bills and expenses related to immigration laws, a Farmers Branch spokesman has said.

The full appeals court heard arguments last September after a three-judge panel ruled against Farmers Branch in March 2012. The decision to have a full rehearing of a case, known as an en banc hearing, is rare and created speculation that judges wanted to reverse the panel’s decision.

Farmers Branch Mayor Bill Glancy said late Monday that he hadn’t yet seen the opinion and couldn’t comment. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a well-known advocate for tougher immigration laws who argued the case on Farmers Branch’s behalf, did not return a phone message Monday.

William Brewer, the plaintiffs’ lead attorney, called the decision “critically important” because the town had “thrust itself into the national debate over immigration.”

Being in the United States without legal permission isn’t a crime on its own, the court said, and immigrants in the process of deportation are often required to give agents a reliable address. Banning immigrants from renting apartments “not only fails to facilitate, but obstructs the goal of bringing potentially removable non-citizens to the attention of the federal authorities,” the court said.

Judges also questioned the process in which a renter or a landlord would be told to appeal a decision under the law in Texas state court. The appeals court said that could open “the door to conflicting state and federal rulings on the question” of whether someone could legally live in America.

Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for Latino civil rights group MALDEF, said the court’s ruling sent a strong message that there were “few legal ways” for states and local governments to get involved in immigration.

“It is our sincere hope that (Farmers Branch) will accept the court’s ruling, stop wasting the taxpayers’ money, and move on to issues of real public concern,” Perales said.

Other towns that have fought to enact similar laws have seen mixed success. A federal appeals court ruled against a renters’ ordinance in Hazleton, Pa., but a different appeals court last month allowed law passed in the eastern Nebraska city of Fremont to go into effect.

 

 

- Advertisements -
- Advertisements -

Latest News

Fort Worth initiates audit, criminal investigation after terminating director of aviation department

Fort Worth City Manager David Cooke has initiated an audit and criminal investigation following the termination of the director of the city's...

Some Dems, not yet Biden, talk of expanding Supreme Court

By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — The prospect that President Donald Trump and Senate Republicans will fill...

Powell and Mnuchin voice optimism but back more economic aid

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER AP Economics Writer WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin...

Fort Worth police partner with MHMR and The Morris Foundation on mental health

The Fort Worth Police Department, with funding from The Morris Foundation and support by My Health My Resources (MHMR), will assure that...

Supreme Court vacancy rattles Susan Collins’ Senate race

By ALAN FRAM and DAVID SHARP Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — It's so on brand for Sen. Susan Collins...