88.9 F
Fort Worth
Sunday, September 27, 2020
- Advertisements -
Government California governor scales back high-speed train

California governor scales back high-speed train

Other News

Exxon’s oil slick

Exxon Mobil is slashing its capital spending budget for 2020 by 30% due to weak demand caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and a market...

Folk music’s Mark Twain: 7 Essential tracks from John Prine,

NEW YORK (AP) — Some people, the songs just come out of them. For nearly half a century, they tumbled out of John Prine...

Tarrant County records another COVID-19 death

Tarrant County Public Health (TCPH) on Wednesday, April 8 reported that a resident of Euless has died as the result of the COVID-19 virus....

Tradition stymied: A year unlike any since WWII for Augusta

The Masters is so intertwined with Augusta, they added an extra day to spring break.You see, the first full week of April isn't just...

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared Tuesday there “isn’t a path” for completing the state’s plan for a high-speed rail line between San Francisco and Los Angeles, yet his office insisted he is fully committed to building such a project.

Newsom, delivering his first State of the State address, said he’d shift his focus to completing just a 171-mile segment of the line already under construction in the state’s Central Valley. The project is key to the economic vitality of the state’s agricultural heartland, he said.

A high-speed rail line linking Los Angeles to San Francisco was the goal when voters approved a ballot measure in 2008. The roughly 520-mile line initially was estimated to cost $33 billion and was pegged for completion in 2020. Officials eventually hoped to connect the line to San Diego and Sacramento.

Subsequent estimates more than doubled the cost to $77 billion and pushed the timeline to 2033.

“Let’s be real,” Newsom said. “The project, as currently planned, would cost too much and take too long . . . Right now, there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to L.A. I wish there were.”

Newsom said he’d continue doing environmental reviews for the LA-San Francisco line and seek private investment to connect the Central Valley to the state’s major hubs, prompting confusion about whether he actually was changing the policy of his predecessor, Jerry Brown.

Newsom’s spokesman Nathan Click said the governor is committed to completing the longer line with additional private and federal money “as the Central Valley section demonstrates the viability of the broader project.”

The questions about Newsom’s rail plans clouded his first State of the State address in which he outlined his vision for leading the nation’s most populous state. California, he said, faces “hard decisions that are coming due” on clean water, housing and homelessness.

Newsom used the speech to contrast his administration with Brown’s as much as he did to take issue with President Donald Trump. He blasted the president’s views on immigration — Newsom called the border emergency “a manufactured crisis” — but also complimented Trump’s calls for lowering prescription drug costs.

Trump has criticized California’s high-speed rail plan. Newsom said the state risked having to return $3.5 billion in federal money if building stops on the Central Valley leg or it doesn’t complete the environmental reviews. Rail leaders have long said they do not have enough state money to complete the line. Private investment has been tied to getting more government investment.

Newsom did not provide any fresh details about how he planned to leverage or gather private money in a way his predecessors could not.

His speech left lawmakers with different interpretations of how the project would move forward.

Democratic state Sen. Anna Caballero, who represents part of the Central Valley, called the shift to a line only from Bakersfield to Merced “disappointing.” But she said she hopes to see that line connected to other state hubs at some point.

“People need to see it move to really feel like it’s important,” she said.

Republican state Sen. Jim Nielsen of Fresno said Newsom’s comments were an acknowledgement the full train would never be completed.

“It cannot be achieved, and the governor has essentially admitted it,” he said. “This entire thing has now changed from whether or not there’s going to be a high-speed rail to what’s going to be left for central California.”

Newsom rejected the idea that his plan would create a “train to nowhere” and said building in the Central Valley would help revitalize the economically depressed region. He also replaced Brown’s head of the state board that oversees the project and pledged more accountability for contractors that run over costs by putting information about how rail dollars are spent online.

Officials at Texas Central, an investor-led project developing the high-speed train between Houston and North Texas, said the California project was vastly different than the one here. .

“We fully understand the complexities of the California high-speed rail project and the drivers that have led to the decision issued yesterday. It is important to contrast both the physical facts that make our project different, as well as the government versus private approach to building such large-scale infrastructure,” said Texas Central CEO and President Carlos Aguilar.

Jeff Davis, a senior fellow at the Eno Center for Transportation and editor of Eno Transportation Weekly, in Washington said the California decision leaves people wondering if the failure of this project in the richest state in the U.S. means that high-speed rail is doomed to failure throughout America.

But, he said, many of the problems that have led to the apparent failure of the California project are unique and don’t necessarily apply to other projects.

Davis identified what he said were seven “worst practices” associated with the project.

Among them, he said, were legally defining project parameters in ways that can never be changed; relying on non-existent, hypothetical funding sources for the bulk of capital costs; appropriating funds with a short deadline for greenfield projects and untried technologies; and allowing the state to spend all the federal dollars first.

Read the full column here:

Why the California Bullet Train Project Failed: 7 “Worst Practices”

Newsom also announced a new head of the state water board, a new chair of the state board of education and a new task force on housing and homelessness. It’s typical for new governors to remake the administration, even if executive power remains within the same party.

He announced the creation of the new Commission on Homelessness & Supportive Housing to address what he said is a moral issue that has become a public health crisis. His administration recently sued the Orange County city of Huntington Beach, accusing it of not meeting mandated affordable housing goals.

The governor has invited the leaders of 47 other noncomplying cities to a meeting next week for what he called “a candid conversation.”

“I don’t intend to file suit against all 47, but I’m not going to preside over neglect and denial,” he said. “These cities need to summon the political courage to build their fair share of housing.”

Newsom also promised to have a plan within 60 days for dealing with the recent bankruptcy filing by Pacific Gas & Electric Corp. after years of devastating wildfires.

He said he has convened a team of the nation’s best bankruptcy lawyers and financial experts from the energy sector to work with his administration to develop a strategy to protect the state’s power grid, wildfire victims, company employees and ratepayers.

“We are all frustrated and angry that it’s come to this,” Newsom said. “PG&E didn’t do enough to secure dangerous equipment or plan for the future.”

He also promised to address the pressure that climate change is putting on utilities.

__

Associated Press writer Don Thompson contributed. The FWBP Staff contributed to this report.

- Advertisements -
- Advertisements -

Latest News

Race for Texas House majority has kept the contest for speaker quiet

By Cassandra Pollock, The Texas Tribune Sept. 25, 2020 "Race for Texas House majority...

Deadly microbe water warning lifted for final Texas city

LAKE JACKSON, Texas (AP) — Environmental officials in Texas have lifted a warning for a final Houston-area community to stop using tap...

After Ginsburg’s death, high stakes for Texas’ legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act

By Emma Platoff and Edgar Walters, The Texas Tribune Sept. 25, 2020 "After Ginsburg’s...

How it happened: From law professor to high court in 4 years

By ZEKE MILLER, COLLEEN LONG and MICHAEL BALSAMO Associated PressWASHINGTON (AP) — Four years ago, Amy Coney Barrett was a little-known law...

Texas senators support Supreme Court nominee

By Kelsey Carolan, The Texas Tribune Sept. 25, 2020 "President Donald Trump nominates Amy...